Using monitoring data to improve interventions is harder than it seems. Decision-makers are often busy implementing activities, unclear about their roles in data collection and analysis and uncertain what data matters most or when.
With PRISMA completing its first five-year phase, this case study shares ten key lessons divided into three sections:
- shaping the culture
- developing systems
- top management decisions
These lessons aim to help programme, sector and intervention managers make better use of monitoring data to improve interventions.
The first phase of the AIP-Rural was implemented from 2013 – 2018, with the second phase (PRISMA-2) from 2019 – 2023 in East Java, West Nusa Tenggara, East Nusa Tenggara, Papua, West Papua and Central Java.